VOTING RIGHTS
Minimizing Barriers to Voting
Given the sharp increase in anti-democratic partisan entrenchment, SCSJ works to combat voter suppression and mitigate its effects through litigation, legal advocacy, and other developing strategies.
In the South, more so than in other areas of the country, voters are likely to contend with reduced or limited early voting opportunities, discriminatory photo identification policies, registration hurdles, partisan interference in election administration.
Increased barriers correlate with low voter turnout — voter turnout in the South was the lowest in any region in the country in 2022 and 2024, according to information collected by the US Census.
Combating Voter Suppression Resources
Missing Voters Report
This report reveals that N.C. has nearly 1.5 million missing voters and seeks to identify how commonsense policy changes can expand voter participation.
North Carolina Photo Voter ID Resources
Resources to help North Carolinian voters, organizations and lawmakers navigate the new rules around voter ID.
North Carolina Voter List Maintenance: 2025 Update
The data for 2025 voter list maintenance is in, and it shows the same disproportionate impact on Black and Brown voters as before.
How We Combat Voter Suppression
Under the false claim of protecting elections, voting rights opponents have weaponized the nuts and bolts of election administration to disenfranchise voters and undermine public confidence in elections. SCSJ has been at the forefront of fighting spurious claims of voter fraud as justification for changes to voting laws that disproportionately affect voters of color. We work to reduce barriers to voting and mitigate the effects of voter suppression efforts. We monitor initiatives aimed at restricting access to the ballot box and advocate against attacks on the right to vote. We provide research, communications, and educational support, as well as legal analysis, to partners across the South about the effects of various anti-voter initiatives and how to combat voter suppression. Additionally, we monitor the implementation of election laws and advocate for pro-voter interpretations of the law to mitigate the effects of anti-voter efforts and improve voter access.
While current trends require greater intentionality when filing new cases, impact litigation remains a critical tool that our partners and clients need us to pursue and ultimately fertilizes the ground for advocacy, communications, and organizing wins. As an organization that has litigated numerous voter suppression cases, we are uniquely situated to evaluate the best avenues to secure legal victories while simultaneously maintaining our commitment to our client's best interests. Working together with directly affected individuals, we link the concerns expressed by our partners to legal issues that hinder historically disadvantaged communities from accessing power and resources. Our novel approaches to litigation that numerous groups in other states have used and even referenced in judicial opinions demonstrate the success of our community lawyering model and how changes and movements in the South have critical national implications. Additionally, any litigation must be moored in the power-building and organizing strategies of the groups we work with, effectively advancing our mission to empower communities across the South. Working with our partners across the region, we use litigation as an opportunity to provide further public education, advocacy, and communications support.
Combating Voter Suppression News
NC Voters, Civil Rights Groups Warn DOJ Settlement Will Burden Eligible Voters
WILMINGTON, N.C. (Sept. 9, 2025) — A deal between the U.S. Department of Justice (DOJ) and the North Carolina State Board of Elections (NCSBE) to settle a lawsuit will force nearly 100,000 registered voters to re-prove their eligibility to vote to ensure future ballots will be counted. Individual North Carolina voters and a coalition of…
Read More NC Voters, Civil Rights Groups Warn DOJ Settlement Will Burden Eligible Voters
Louisiana Historians Argue Need for Voting Rights Act Protections in U.S. Supreme Court Brief
WASHINGTON, D.C. (Sept. 4, 2025) – A group of Louisiana historians has filed an amicus brief this week with the U.S. Supreme Court urging reversal of a lower court ruling that struck down the state’s congressional map creating a second majority-Black district. The filing in consolidated cases, Louisiana v. Callais and Robinson v. Callais, argues…
Read More Louisiana Historians Argue Need for Voting Rights Act Protections in U.S. Supreme Court Brief
