• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to footer

Allison Riggs

Co-Executive Director / Chief Counsel, Voting Rights
allisonriggs@scsj.org

Allison Riggs leads the voting rights program at the Southern Coalition for Social Justice, an organization she joined in 2009.  In March of 2020, she also took over as Interim Executive Director of the organization, and in March of 2021, became the permanent co-Executive Director.

Her voting rights work over the last decade at SCSJ has been focused on fighting for fair redistricting plans, fighting against voter suppression, and advocating for electoral reforms that would expand access to voting.

She has litigated redistricting cases on behalf of State NAACP Conferences in Texas, Florida, Virginia and North Carolina. In 2018, she argued the Texas redistricting case in the United States Supreme Court, and in 2019, she argued the North Carolina partisan gerrymandering case in the Supreme Court.  Allison works closely with grassroots organizations and communities of color as they seek to advance their political and civil rights.  She received her undergraduate, Master’s Degree and J.D. from the University of Florida.

Hilary Harris Klein

Counsel, Voting Rights
hilaryhklein@scsj.org

Hilary Harris Klein joined Southern Coalition for Social Justice in 2020 as Counsel for the voting rights program.

Hilary graduated with honors from Georgetown University Law Center, where she was a Global Law Scholar and Pro Bono Pledge Recognition recipient.  After law school, Hilary practiced commercial litigation, arbitration, and global investigations in the New York office of Freshfields Bruckhaus Deringer, where she co-led the US Pro-Bono Associate Counsel and served as lead counsel in Prisoner’s Rights and Anti-Human Trafficking matters, for which she twice received the Legal Aid Society’s Pro Bono Public Award. 

After moving to North Carolina in 2018, Hilary served as a term law clerk for the Honorable Catherine C. Eagles of the Middle District of North Carolina. Hilary also holds a B.S.E., magna cum laude, in Bioengineering from the University of Pennsylvania and served for two years as a Peace Corps Volunteer in Tanzania before law school.

Southern Coalition for Social Justice

Southern Coalition for Social Justice

Partnering with communities of color and economically disadvantaged communities in the south to defend and advance their political, social and economic rights through the combination of legal advocacy, research, organizing and communications.

  • Home
  • About
    • Staff
    • Board of Directors
    • Employment Opportunities
  • News
  • Programs
    • Voting Rights
      • News
      • Featured Cases
      • Resources
    • Justice System Reform
      • News
      • Featured Cases
      • Resources
    • Youth Justice Project
      • News
      • Resources
  • Resources
    • Make a Voting Plan: North Carolina
    • Make a Voting Plan: National
    • #MyVoteMyVoice
    • Early Voting Advocacy 2020
    • Videos
    • Reports
    • Infographics
    • SCSJ-led Projects
  • SCSJ Monthly Digest
  • Contact
  • Donate

Search Southern Coalition for Social Justice

Voting Rights Organizations Continue Fight to Ensure All North Carolina Mail-In Ballots Are Counted

Durham, N.C. — Democracy North Carolina, the League of Women Voters of North Carolina and individual North Carolina voters who have or plan to vote by mail this General Election have filed motions in two different federal lawsuits to guarantee that all absentee vote-by-mail ballots are counted, even if the voter makes a mistake when filling out their ballot envelope.

October 2, 2020 by Allison Riggs Focus Area: Voting Rights

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE
October 2, 2020

For media inquiries:
Michelle Rash (SCSJ)
mrash@rlfcommunications.com
336-553-1733 (office)
336-823-5501 (mobile)


Rich Robinson (FEC)
rrobinson@fairelectionscenter.org
202-696-3406 (mobile)

Durham, N.C. — Democracy North Carolina, the League of Women Voters of North Carolina and individual North Carolina voters who have or plan to vote by mail this General Election have filed motions in two different federal lawsuits to guarantee that all absentee vote-by-mail ballots are counted, even if the voter makes a mistake when filling out their ballot envelope.

On Sept. 30, the organizational and individual plaintiffs in Democracy North Carolina et al v. North Carolina State Board of Elections et al filed a motion asking the court to enforce a preliminary injunction granted on Aug. 4. The injunction requires county boards of elections to notify voters of issues with mail-in ballots that may lead to their rejections and provide the voter due process to correct the issue. The motion, filed in the U.S. District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina, said the North Carolina State Board of Elections (NCSBE) has not issued clear guidance on that notification and remedy process, known as “curing,” and that the current process fails to provide voters with adequate notice and opportunity to be heard.

On Oct. 1, Democracy North Carolina, the League of Women Voters of North Carolina and many of the same individual voters filed a motion to intervene as defendants in Moore et al v. Circosta et al, a lawsuit that was filed in the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina on Sept. 26. That lawsuit challenges the limited guidance issued by NCSBE on the cure process and asks the court to prohibit these guidelines from taking effect. A hearing held in the case late afternoon Oct. 2 included discussion of the motion to intervene, but no ruling has been issued.

In both lawsuits, the plaintiffs are represented by the Southern Coalition for Social Justice, Fair Elections Center and pro bono counsel from law firm WilmerHale.

“An unprecedented number of voters are expected to use absentee vote-by-mail this year as they seek to cast their ballots safely in the midst of the COVID-19 pandemic,” said Hilary Harris Klein, Voting Rights Attorney with the Southern Coalition for Social Justice. “We are working to ensure that every voter who decides to use this method knows that if they make a mistake on their mail-in ballot envelope, they will have the opportunity to correct it and have their vote counted.”

In North Carolina, approximately 329,700 mail-in ballots have been received through Oct. 1. An estimated 96.8% of those ballots have been accepted, including at least 1,060 which have already been cured. About 8,400 ballots have been identified as having potential issues that voters may have the chance to correct. Another 2,080 ballots have been discarded at the voter’s request.

Democracy North Carolina et al v. North Carolina State Board of Elections et al

According to the motion filed in the U.S. Middle District for North Carolina on Sept. 30, the NCSBE sent a memo to county boards of elections on Aug. 21 outlining the cure process. On Sept. 4, ballots began being mailed to voters who had requested them. On Sept. 11, the NCSBE contacted the directors of all county boards of elections asking them to stop notifying voters of potential issues “for the next few days” and promising updated guidance “by the end of the day.” That new guidance was not issued until Sept. 22.

The cure process outlined by NCSBE does not address a few key concerns. For example, it does not provide a required timeline for county boards of elections to review ballots and notify voters of potential issues. Furthermore, the revised guidance issued on Sept. 22 does not allow for voters to be heard during the county canvass period about any deficiencies with their ballot envelopes if they do not have time to correct the issue or vote in-person.

Moore et al v. Circosta et aland a similar lawsuit filed at the same time have created additional confusion among county boards of elections on how to proceed.

“At least one county board of elections has delayed notifying voters of deficiencies, choosing to simply refrain from engaging in this process until there is more certainty to what the final cure process will require,” the motion states. “Overall, this delay and uncertainty risks disenfranchising voters who, per this Court’s order from August, are entitled to be contacted and given an opportunity to cure if there is a deficiency with their absentee ballot.”

In their motion, the plaintiffs ask the court to require:

  • That voters receive notice of errors with their ballot envelopes no later than three business days after the ballot is received;
  • That counties use phone numbers, email addresses and North Carolina’s ballot tracking system, BallotTrax, to notify voters of potential errors, not relying solely on mail;
  • That county boards of elections create a variety of opportunities for voters to be heard, including remotely and nights and weekends.

The motion also requests that the jurisdiction over the preliminary injunction, and its enforcement, remain with the U.S. District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina.

Moore at al v. Circosta et al

Moore at al v. Circosta et al was filed Sept. 26 by North Carolina’s legislative leadership and three individual voters against the individual members and director of the NCSBE. The lawsuit argues that the new guidelines regarding the cure process for mail-in ballots issued by the NCSBE are unconstitutional because they took away the General Assembly’s authority to establish the election process in North Carolina. The plaintiffs seek a preliminary injunction to prevent these guidelines from taking effect.

The plaintiffs in Democracy North Carolina et al v. North Carolina State Board of Elections et al seek to intervene as defendants, arguing that the rights to a cure granted voters in their case would be lost if the legislative plaintiffs in Moore at al v. Circosta et al succeed in gaining an injunction.

“It is important that we continue to fight to preserve the rights of every voter to have their vote counted,” said Fair Elections Center Senior Counsel Jon Sherman. “With so many people expected to vote by mail for the first time this fall, it is vital that we keep a process in place to make sure every ballot is accepted and individuals have the opportunity to correct any mistakes made.”

###

The Southern Coalition for Social Justice, founded in 2007, partners with communities of color and economically disadvantaged communities in the South to defend and advance their political, social, and economic rights through the combination of legal advocacy, research, organizing and communications. Learn more at southerncoalition.org and follow our work on Twitter and Facebook.

Fair Elections Center is a national nonpartisan and non-profit voting rights and election reform organization based in Washington, DC whose mission is to use litigation, public education and advocacy to remove barriers to registration and voting, and to improve election administration.

Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr LLP (WilmerHale) provides legal representation across a comprehensive range of practice areas that are critical to the success of its clients. The law firm’s leading Intellectual Property, Litigation/Controversy, Regulatory and Government Affairs, Securities, and Transactional Departments participate in some of the highest-profile legal and policy matters. With a staunch commitment to public service, the firm is renowned as a leader in pro bono representation. WilmerHale is 1,000 lawyers strong with 13 offices in the United States, Europe and Asia. For more information, please visit www.wilmerhale.com.

Key Contacts

Allison Riggs, Co-Executive Director / Chief Counsel, Voting Rights
allisonriggs@scsj.org

Hilary Harris Klein, Counsel, Voting Rights
hilaryhklein@scsj.org

Category iconPress Release,  Recent News,  Voting Rights

Next Article: #CounselorsNotCops: Wake County Black Student Coalition Demands
Previous Article: Federal Lawsuit Challenges North Carolina Felony Voting Law

Footer

Contact

1415 West Highway 54, Suite 101
Durham, NC 27707
info@southerncoalition.org
office: 919-323-3380
fax: 919-323-3942
Map

Key Links

About
Donate
Most Recent 990
Staff
Board

The Latest

Similar to other voters who testified this week, Mr. Kearney said that under NC's last voter ID law: 👉🏾poll workers seemed confused 👉🏾he was given the wrong ballot 👉🏾he was given no instructions to cure his ballot 👉🏾his vote didn’t count This is why we fight. #NCvoterIDtrial pic.twitter.com/8nYb…

About an hour ago

#NCVoterIDtrial resumed today w/ testimony from lifelong Warren Co. voter Paul Kearney who was disenfranchised in 2016 by NC's last voter ID law. Despite having “a billfold full of IDs,” Kearney, who is Black, didn't have the right ID that day. His provisional vote wasn't counted pic.twitter.com/0YoJ…

Yesterday

Following testimony from political scientist Dr. Kevin Quinn, NC voter Daniel Smith testified in day four of the #NCvoterIDtrial. Smith was disenfranchised by NC’s prior voter ID law when he attempted to vote using a temporary driver’s license after misplacing his original.

About 2 days ago

From historians to #ncga experts to election officials — this week’s testimony in the #NCvoterIDtrial has shed light on the process that led to NC’s discriminatory voter ID law and the effect of voter ID on eligible NC voters. The trial continues now: bit.ly/3uTNuVK pic.twitter.com/pPAR…

About 2 days ago

“As we saw in Georgia and we are seeing in Texas, Arizona, North Carolina and Michigan and plenty of other states, this is a coordinated, multi-pronged attack on the freedom to vote in this country” thecharlottepost.com…

About 2 days ago

Follow @scsj
  • Email
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • YouTube
Copyright © 2021 Southern Coalition for Social Justice · All Rights Reserved · Website by Tomatillo Design