Featured Entries

SCSJ Speaks on Eminent Domain and Environmental Justice

SCSJ staff attorney Christopher Brook spoke at the Southern University Law Journal of Race, Gender, and Poverty symposium "We're Taking Your Property Expropriation and Property Rights" on March 17, 2011. Speaking on a panel entitled "Public Policy: Measuring the Impact of Eminent Domain," Brook highlighted the connection between governmental uses of eminent domain authority to seize private property without consent and environmental justice challenges facing communities of color. Brook, whose practice areas at SCSJ include environmental justice, highlighted his work in the New Hill community's fight against the siting of a sewage treatment plant and the Northeast Greensboro community's fight against the expansion of the White Street landfill.

Buen Pastor Church Case

Members of Raleigh’s Buen Pastor Church are fighting and praying to stop the deportation of twenty-six of its congregants. The church group was travelling together back to North Carolina after attending a religious retreat when Customs & Border Protection (CBP) pulled over three church vans in Louisiana. Some forty-five congregants were transported to the CBP processing office – at least half of them young U.S. citizen children. While there, the group was subjected to religious taunts and the congregants’ repeated requests to call a lawyer were denied. The children spent six to eight hours on the floor, without food or drink. At the end of the process, adults were told that if they refused to sign the papers, they would be deported, and the United States would “keep” the children, putting them into orphanages. SCSJ has filed Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) requests to seek CBP records about the stop and arrest. In immigration court, SCSJ will file a Motion to Suppress Evidence & Terminate Proceedings based on CBP’s constitutional, statutory, and regulatory violations. Read more about the case in this news article.


Take Action! As part of the evidence for SCSJ's suppression of removal case -- which demands that the government drop the original case -- SCSJ is calling on churches with strong a Latino and immigrant base to express their outrage about the Buen Pastor stop. Attached below is a letter to download which you can sign and return to SCSJ. The letters will then be submitted alongside a legal brief to show the impact of racial profiling in immigrant and Latino communities. Download the letter return it to Rebecca Fontaine, SCSJ Immigrant Rights Organizer, via fax or email. Fax: 919-323-3942 Email: rebecca@southerncoalition.org

Raleigh church members sue feds, allege racial profiling

Editor's note: The names of the undocumented immigrants have been withheld for their safety. It is the Indy's policy to disclose the names of undocumented immigrants only when they have been formally charged with a crime, have pleaded guilty or have been convicted. Updated on March 7: Elizabeth Simpson, attorney for the congregants, told the Indy that while the individuals are charged with being undocumented, the charges have not yet been sustained in immigration court. It was Easter weekend, April 2010. More than 50 Latino men, women, boys and girls, traveling in a caravan of three church vans and six cars, wound their way through Louisiana along Interstate 10, just after midnight. For the Raleigh-based Buen Pastor Church congregation, this route was not unfamiliar. Church members—most of them undocumented immigrants—were returning home after a weeklong jubilation in Houston, Texas, for Santa Cena—the "holy meal" celebrating the Last Supper. Outside Lake Charles, the flashing lights of U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP) cars appeared in the vans' rear-view mirrors. Agents pulled the vans over, although, congregation members say, they were driving under the required speed limit. What happened next continues to haunt the congregation: Agents interrogated them from midnight until dawn, allegedly calling them names and humiliating them. Earlier this week, the Southern Coalition for Social Justice, which is representing Buen Pastor, and the congregation sued the U.S. government in federal court. The suit was filed with the Eastern District of North Carolina, which includes Raleigh. They are requesting the release of agency records from CBP, the U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services (CIS) and U.S. Department of Homeland Security (DHS), in hopes of reviewing documents that detail the events of that night. (The groups originally filed a Freedom of Information Act request, but received no response.) Press officers with CBP and CIS did not return repeated calls and e-mails from the Indy seeking comment. Trailing the vans, Buen Pastor's minister was driving a car with his wife and five children asleep in the back. The minister says he saw agents pull over the church vans, which carried 24 adults and 18 children. He continued driving and watched in his rearview mirror as the men he calls brothers were handcuffed and patted down. He acknowledges that he had only one thought, and that was to protect his family. "The agents didn't stop our cars," he told the Indy through a translator. "I know God was watching over us that night, because He allowed us to get by unnoticed." The drivers of the six cars, including the pastor, traveled for 20 miles before stopping at a gas station. Inside, they clung to one another, sobbing, until they realized they were drawing attention to themselves. They got back in their cars and left Louisiana. For their fellow church members who had been detained, the ordeal continued. According to congregants' legal testimonies gathered by the coalition, agents banged against the side of the vans and shouted at the passengers. Some of the agents reportedly handcuffed the men and placed them in squad cars. Other agents slid into the drivers' seats of the church vans—while the children sobbed and the women tried to calm them—and drove them to the CBP Port of Entry headquarters in Lake Charles. Once at CBP headquarters, men, still handcuffed, were placed in jail cells, while the women and children huddled against the office walls. When some began praying and softly singing hymns, an agent, according to the testimony, laughed and told them, "Let's see if your God will save you from this." Similar to some Mennonites and the Amish, the congregation's women do not wear pants and always wear colorful head coverings that are netted and sometimes beaded. Two agents reportedly told the women they "looked stupid," and another asked, "Do you wear those scarves so you don't have to brush your hair?" In the office, the agents interviewed each family individually, and according to the congregants, denied their repeated requests to call a lawyer. The agents completed paperwork and told the parishioners to sign their names on forms written in English. When the men and women hesitated—not knowing what they were signing—the agents reportedly told them, in a mix of Spanish and English, that if they did not sign the forms, they would be sent to separate jails, and the children would be sent to orphanages and become property of the United States. Under duress, the adults signed the papers, and around 6 a.m., were allowed to leave—but only after an agent reportedly asked the group to stand together so he could take a photo with his personal camera to show his wife. According to the congregants' testimony, he told them that they were his office's "biggest catch yet." The church vans pulled out of Lake Charles, with six empty seats. A half-dozen single men were detained by the CBP and deported back to Mexico within weeks. "I feel responsible," said Buen Pastor's minister, as he held his sleeping toddler in one arm and a large Bible in a tan tooled-leather cover in the other. "I am their leader and I took them to the celebration. It weighs on me." He came to North Carolina 11 years ago, and has served his Raleigh congregation of about 80 people for the past decade. A quiet man, he said he found his calling as a New Evangelical minister in 1994, while living in Mexico. The congregation was aware that there could be risks in taking the trip, but, the minister said, they were not afraid because most of them had traveled to Santa Cena many times before. The coalition took the church's case for free last October. If the church's requests are not answered, the coalition and the church plan to sue the federal government, says the coalition staff attorney, Elizabeth Simpson. Simpson represents 22 of the church members in removal proceedings by the Immigration Court in Charlotte as a result of their arrests. The men and women could be deported by April. The coalition is arguing that the CBP stop was based on racial profiling and violated the Fourth Amendment. The men and women facing removal have no criminal record, said Simpson. "The agents' behavior during the arrest was pretty appalling," she added. "Taunting the group about whether "their God would save them. They were also joking about what a 'big commission' they would earn for catching so many 'illegals' at once." Since that night, the minister says members of Buen Pastor have felt afraid. "We see police officers not as someone that could help us but harm us," he said. "Before this fear we would go out into the streets, to the park or lake, but now when we leave our house we don't know if we will come back." The 18 children who were sleeping in the church vans that night and awakened to seeing their fathers handcuffed and driven away, have suffered most. (The children were released.) "Some of these children have a father or mother awaiting deportation," said the minister. "Others cry when their dad goes to work, or rush home from school worried he will not be there."

Buen Pastor Congregation Holds Vigil for Immigrant Rights

On Friday, February 18, 2011, members of Raleigh’s Buen Pastor congregation held a vigil calling for human rights for all immigrants. The vigil was attended by allies from the Farm Labor Organizing Committee (FLOC), the North Carolina DREAM Team, and other Raleigh congregations. During the vigil, the group called for justice for the church members who are currently fighting deportation. Some forty-five parishioners – including eighteen young children -- were stopped by Border Patrol last spring, as the group travelled home to North Carolina from a religious event in Texas. During the course of their arrest, they were subjected to terrible abuses by Border Patrol, who taunted them for their religious practice, denied them the right to call a lawyer, and warned them that if they refused to sign certain papers, the government would take away their children. SCSJ is representing the group in removal proceedings, seeking suppression of evidence and termination of proceedings based on the constitutional, statutory, and regulatory violations that Border Patrol committed.

More Rural North Carolinians Receive End-of-Life Documents

The Southern Coalition for Social Justice conducted its third wills’ clinic in Tarboro, North Carolina the weekend of February 19-20. During the clinic, twelve Edgecombe and Nash County residents had forty-four end of life documents made free of charge. Many thanks go to everyone who made the service possible: SCSJ coordinating attorney Chris Brook, the office of the Edgecombe County Agricultural Extension, and the ten law student volunteers from Carolina, Central, and Campbell Law. Carolina Law first-year and second time wills’ clinic volunteer D.J. Dore reflected that, “This type of work is exactly why I went to law school. It’s a great feeling to get outside the classroom and do something meaningful.” Pictured left: Central Law Third-year Aishah Casseus and Campbell Law Third-year Paul Zucchino assist Edgecombe County resident Gwendolyn Hooker in the preparation of end of life documents.

SCSJ Conducts Know Your Rights Housing Training

Too often, North Carolina Latino residents are taken advantage of in their efforts to rent or purchase homes. On Sunday January 30, SCSJ organized an educational event to empower Latinos living in the Moore County, North Carolina town of Robbins. SCSJ staff attorney Chris Brook (pictured), along with representatives from the Northern Moore Family Resource Center, the NC Justice Center and Self-Help Credit Union, spoke to community members after church about their rights as tenants and home-owners as well as opportunities available to them to purchase a home. These representatives also fielded questions from the over twenty-five attendees in regards to their particular housing challenges. “Over fifty percent of the Robbins population is Latino, and many adults have limited English language skills and/or limited knowledge of the United States financial system. The information presented in Spanish and English empowered families to make smart decisions about housing in the future,” said Clare Ruggles, Executive Director of the North Moore Family Resource Center. Outreach efforts such as this know-your-rights session in Robbins are part of SCSJ’s larger work to safeguard the housing rights of communities of color.

Navy stops work on OLF sites in Va., NC

____________________

Navy stops work on OLF sites in Va., NC: wavy.com

WASHINGTON (WAVY) - The Navy said Thursday it will stop all work on its Draft Environmental Impact Study (DEIS) regarding potential Outlying Landing Fields (OLF) to replace Fentress Field in Chesapeake for at least three years. LT Paul Macapagal, a Navy spokesperson, released the following statement to WAVY News 10: "The Navy is suspending release of and stopping work on the Outlying Landing Field (OLF) Draft Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) until the east coast Navy Joint Strike Fighter (JSF) basing and training requirements are better defined. The East Coast Navy JSF Basing EIS will commence at a time to be determined, but no earlier than 2014. Thus, no earlier than 2014, the Navy will re-evaluate the OLF requirement and potential east coast JSF home basing locations." WAVY has learned the Navy is suspending the OLF DEIS while is focuses on home basing the new Joint Strike Fighter (JSF) on the West Coast. Navy JSF squadrons are proposed to be based on the West Coast beginning in 2015. The announcement means there will be no movement on a potential replacement for Fentress Auxiliary Landing Field for at least three years. Fentress serves as an OLF for fighter jets stationed at Naval Air Station Oceana in Virginia Beach. You don't have to search hard to see how people in Gates County feel about the proposed OLF. People here have been fighting the Navy for years. They wanted to see the proposed landing strip go somewhere else. They're worried about the noise and what it could do the environment. "We really don't want it here," said Gates County resident Larry Davis. The Navy had several possible sites picked out in rural Virginia and North Carolina. Navy officials wanted to build an airfield where pilots could practice aircraft carrier landings. "In North Carolina, they have been trying to put a base here for over 10 years," added Gates County Commissioner Kenneth Jernigan. For now, the fight has been put on hold, so have the plans for an OLF. Navy officials were in the process of doing an environmental study which has now been postponed. "I felt like it's great news for the county," added Jernigan. "We've been fighting this thing for the last three years and this tells us that maybe they are going to look and decide if it's really needed in our area." Navy Officials tell WAVY.com the reason the OLF has been delayed is because of the new F-35C jets. Officials want to determine where jets will be based before constructing an OLF. A decision won't be made anytime before 2014. The longer the better for people in Gates County. "We have a lot of elderly people that have been here for years," Davis said. "I'm a service man myself and I know the noise. The noise is rough at night for people sleeping." The Navy announced in August, 2009 that it was delaying the release of the draft Environmental Impact Statement, saying delays had pushed the OLF timeline back to a point where it coincided with the commencement of the EIS process for homebasing of the F-35C Navy Joint Strike Fighter. At the time, the Navy said including JSF data in the OLF EIS would ensure the Navy incorporates all relevant factors in the analysis in a fiscally responsible manner. The Navy has been exploring the development of an OLF since 2000, citing the lack of training capacity at Oceana and Fentress. Oceana and Fentress have been encircled by suburban development. The Navy contends that it needs another strip to relieve the pressure on the two facilities. Sites for the potential OLF were identified in Surry, Southampton, and Sussex Counties, in Virginia;, and in Camden and Gates Counties in North Carolina. "The Navy made the right decision," said Vance Aydlett Jr., chairman of the Currituck County, N.C., Board of Commissioners, in a statement. "The Navy promised that it would not build an OLF in a community that did not want it and today it followed through on the promise." Sen. Kay Hagan, D-N.C., said in a statement that she was thrilled with the Navy's decision. "We do not want an OLF in northeastern North Carolina," Hagan said. "The people I meet with are absolutely outraged at the prospect of an OLF in their backyards, and I have been working to prevent it." Last September, North Carolina Gov. Beverly Perdue and the state's top legislative leaders signed a letter sent to Navy Secretary Ray Mabus saying the outlying landing field shouldn't be forced upon any community in the state. The letter said the state didn't oppose the landing field idea "at an appropriate location in North Carolina." "I am so proud of the citizens of Camden and Currituck counties," said Sandra Duckwall, chairman of the Camden County Board of Commissioners. "From grassroots citizen groups to school children, our community bonded together to protect our region's quality of life." In Virginia Beach, home of Naval Air Station Oceana, officials remain confident that the delay in any Fentress OLF replacement will not negatively impact the Master Jet Base. "When you think back a few years ago and Oceana was on the chopping block, any time you hear anything pertaining to a change or pertaining to Oceana it's going to perhaps be an alert or an alarm to someone," Virginia Beach Mayor Will Sessoms told WAVY News 10 on Friday. And while the Mayor understands the concern among some business leaders and citizens in Virginia Beach, for now he does not share that concern. "I say it also with a great deal of confidence." According to Sessoms, Virginia Beach's efforts to curb development around Oceana has won great favor with the Navy. "We have become a model for how to deal with encroachments, one that the Navy's using across the country." Congressman Scott Rigell issued a statement to 10 On Your Side on Friday, stating "I have been actively engaged with the Navy over this issue and I will work with the other members of the Virginia Delegation and take the necessary steps to proactively support our critical military assets."

Gates County Residents Halt Navy's Plan of Environmental Injustice

The tireless efforts of the Gates County Citizens Against OLF have proven victorious. The Navy announced today that it is suspending its evaluation process to secure a site for the construction of an Outlying Landing Field (OLF) until 2014. An OLF is used for Navy pilots to practice landing in conditions similar to landing on an aircraft carrier, and Gates County is one of five counties in the northeastern NC area that the Navy had been evaluating as a potential site for the OLF. SCSJ is representing Citizens Against OLF in Gates County. The group organized an anti-OLF boat parade in 2009 and have secured support from both North Carolina Senators, congressional representatives, the Governor, and other state elected officials. Citizens Against OLF is also leading a legal battle against the Navy. A low-income, rural, significantly African-American community near the Virginia border in northeastern North Carolina, Gates County residents have been in opposition to the Navy constructing an OLF in their community or any of the surrounding communities for several years. Navy representatives have even stated publicly that an OLF is “not necessarily needed.” But the construction of an OLF would mean the loss and destruction of centuries-old family farms. In addition, Gates County is home to diverse and threatened species that are indigenous to North Carolina. These habitats would be permanently disrupted by the construction of an OLF. The Navy's announcement today shows that organized community pressure coupled with legal and media strategies can alter power towards the interests of the community.

Noise ordinance approved

____________________ GATESVILLE – After 12 months of tweaking, Gates County is now the proud new owner of a more defined noise ordinance. By a unanimous vote at their January 19 meeting, the Gates County Board of Commissioners adopted the ordinance, only after one final round of slight modifications was placed in the six-age document. In its early stages, the ordinance was presented to the commissioners by the Citizens Against OLF as they continue their efforts to prevent the Navy from possibly constructing an Outlying Landing Field (practice facility) in the Sandbanks area of Gates County. Duke University researchers joined forces with the anti-OLF group to put the document in writing. As the debate progressed over the wording of the ordinance, Gates County Sheriff Ed Webb as well as judges and attorneys voiced concerns over enforcement and legal issues. “We’ve addressed the concerns the Sheriff’s Office and judges had,” Commissioner Henry Jordan said at last week’s meeting. Section 2 now adds the sentence: Sound measurement standards will be implemented when authorized by the Gates County Board of Commissioners at a later date. There was concern about the cost of the equipment needed to measure sound as well as calibration standards of that equipment, Jordan noted. “We feel we need these sound measuring standards in place if the OLF does decide to come here at which time we can activate that part of the ordinance,” Jordan said. The Sheriff’s deputies will use sensory perception to judge noise level, as is currently the case. “All the changes seem to address the issues that have been brought up previously,” said Commissioner Jack Owens. “I’m fine with this as it is; I know there has been a lot of work put into this, not only by Duke, but locally as well and I certainly support this,” Commission Vice-Chair Kenneth Jernigan stated. Commission Chairman Graham Twine thanked Jordan for all the time he invested in getting the ordinance to this point. The public also had their say last week concerning the ordinance. Linda Warren, representing the Citizens Against OLF, said Duke University and the Southern Coalition lawyers worked with the local group to come up with the basis for a noise ordinance. “The OLF is certainly about jet noise; we were guided in this to build an ordinance dealing with noise,” Warren said. “This ordinance will be a stumbling block for the Navy. We think it’s important to get the message across to the Navy that the noise they’re trying to move out of Virginia Beach is not something we want in Gates County.” Warren added that the Navy had been asked about flight paths, inquiring of the route the jets would take to get to Gates County. “It’s not just involving the Sandbanks; the flight paths given by the Navy to the FAA (Federal Aviation Commission) has those jets coming from Oceana (Naval Air Station) straight down to Moyock (northern Currituck County) and coming straight across to the Sandbanks,” Warren said. “Those jets will cut across the heart of Gates County; their flight paths can be eight miles wide. That brings those jets across our state park, over our beautiful river; across our schools and across our neighbors and friends…that’s why we need a noise ordinance and thanks to everyone for working so hard on this.” “I had made some previous comments about the decibel meters and the calibration equipment, however, that’s just a small portion when considering what could happen in the county,” said J.E. Harrell. “When you talk about the noise, it’s huge, but it’s also more far reaching than that. These folks that have their land and their way of life threatened, it speaks for the need for a noise ordinance and anything we can do to stop these jets. My heart goes out to this group.” Wade Askew, a former county commissioner who was a part of orchestrating the noise ordinance, asked about the language of the document pertaining to agricultural and forestry operations. Twine commented that Section 5 (Exceptions) dealt with that, quoting, “Agricultural and forestry operations and the like shall not constitute a nuisance and thus shall not be subject to the requirements of this ordinance, except when a nuisance results from negligence or improper operation of any agricultural or forestry equipment or its appurtenances.” Danny Byrum said he had stood in the yard of a man living near Langley (Virginia airfield) and they could not hear each other talk over the sound of jets flying overhead. “He said you couldn’t even listen to TV in your house when the jets were flying,” Byrum recalled. “It’s quite a big deal. Our way of life will be gone if the jets come here. This whole county will never be the same.” Joe Greene said while he was living near Oceana his family experienced the sound of jets on a daily and nightly basis. “It will change your life; they will rattle your house,” he said. “There is no day or night to them.” Upon exiting the public hearing, County Manager Toby Chappell, citing concerns of county attorney Pitt Godwin, directed the commissioners’ attention to section 7 of the ordinance. The board agreed with Godwin and struck a portion of subsection C of that section…“Officer provides intermediate noise protection/abatement when necessary and intermediate inclusiveness/identification of the types of prohibited noises observed.” Commissioner John Hora asked Sheriff Webb if he was in agreement with the provisions of the ordinance since Webb and his staff would be responsible for enforcement. “The main thing is officer perception,” Webb said. “If we get a call about a loud muffler or a loud radio we can issue a citation. We usually try to issue a warning the first time and move up from there in citations, especially when you keep going back to the same person (making the noise).” The ordinance provides for a fine of not more than $50 or imprisonment of not more than 30 days should any person violating any of the provisions of the ordinance be found guilty of a misdemeanor. Additionally, the county, as a first remedy, can issue a civil fine of $50 for a noise nuisance violation. Upon a motion by Jordan and a second from Jernigan, the commissioners approved the ordinance as modified with the noted changes.

SCSJ Contributes to a National Report on Immigration Policing

____________________ SCSJ contributed to a national report released in December by the National Network for Immigrant and Refugee Rights. "Injustice for All: The Rise of the U.S. Immigration Policing Regime" denounces human rights abuses occurring across immigrant and refugee communities in the United States. SCSJ’s contribution to the report, written by Immigrants Rights Organizer Rebecca Fontaine, focuses on the way local immigration enforcement fuels an environment in which immigrant women become more vulnerable targets of sexual assault and domestic violence.