Featured Entries

Human Rights Members Protest Immigration Measure

By Amanda Fitzpatrick RALEIGH (WTVD) -- More than 100 members of the Southern Human Rights Organizer conference, organized in front of the Wake County Jail Saturday to protest against Wake County's 287-G program. Jaribu Hill came from Mississippi and says the program is unfair. "287-G is a measure put in place by law enforcement to chill and the measure to chill and curtail the movement of immigrant people," Hill said. The measure gives local authorities some ability to enforce federal immigration laws. Inside the Wake County jail, they are allowed to check the legal status of every inmate that comes through the doors, using the inmates' fingerprints. Rosa Saavedra, a Wake County activist says she met a pregnant woman whose family was destroyed because of the new bill. "I met a lady whose husband was taken away due to this 287-G," she said. "The police took him here, haul him away for a minor traffic violation." Some argue the program encourages racial profiling. They believe the police target Hispanics and take them to jail for minor traffic violations so they can fingerprint them to find their legal status --later deporting them out of the country. But Wake County Sheriff Donnie Harrison disagrees, in an earlier interview he says the 287-G program has kept criminals off the streets. "We've already caught people that were wanted in other states and other counties," he said. "So to me, when we get a criminal off the street, regardless of how we do it, if we're doing it legally, then it's a plus for us." Harrison says they've found more than 550 illegal immigrants at the jail since 287-G started in Wake County and with the new technology, that number could increase.

Harm-Free Zone Roundtable

SCSJ invites allies and organizers to participate in an exciting new project that is developing in our area called the Harm Free Zone (HFZ). The purpose of the HFZ is to reduce our community’s reliance on police and prisons as a solution to social, economic, and political problems. The project will offer tools such as trainings, dialogue, and other materials that can help strengthen a community’s response to conflict and violence. We are hosting a “roundtable” meeting on Saturday, March 14, 2009 from 10:00am-3:00pm in Meeting Room #2 of the Stanford L. Warren Library, 1201 Fayetteville St., Durham, NC. We would greatly appreciate your feedback about the viability of this project and hope you will work with us to launch a harm free zone within your community. Lunch will be provided free of charge. The Harm Free Zone project grew from the ideas of several people in the Triangle area. We are a group of concerned community organizers, artists, and educators based in Durham and Chapel Hill. The HFZ organizing committee consists of organizations such as Critical Resistance, Ella Baker Center, Southern Coalition for Social Justice, SpiritHouse, UBUNTU, and the Youth Noise Network. We are also interested in expanding the HFZ organizing committee—the core group of people (individuals and organizations) who are grounding the project—and would love for you to join us! Please RSVP to 919.452.1972 (evenings preferred), to let us know if you can make it. We look forward to talking, sharing and building with you on March 14th!

Checkpoint Monitoring Training

This training will give citizens the tools and skills they need to monitor traffic checkpoints in the Triangle for evidence of racial profiling. Location: 103…

Secure Communities: 287(g) with lipstick?

Orange County's reputation as a welcoming place for immigrants, documented or undocumented, may be dented by the sheriff department's participation in the federal "Secure Communities" program. At issue is whether Secure Communities significantly differs from the controversial federal 287(g) program. The Orange County Board of Commissioners last night asked Sheriff Lindy Pendergrass to explain the county's participation, beginning this month, in Secure Communities. The pilot federal project grants the U.S. Department of Homeland Security and the Federal Bureau of Investigation automatic access to the personal information of people arrested in Orange County. The Commission heard Pendergrass' report, but took no action. The program is intended to help federal authorities locate illegal immigrants who have also been charged with crimes unrelated to immigration, including traffic violations, Pendergrass said. "The system is simply that, when you fingerprint someone, it goes through the system, and we get a correct identification of the individual," Pendergrass said, referring to the DHS and FBI databases. "The system does go through the right side of Homeland Security, but we do not—and they do not tell us—if someone we have fingerprinted is someone who is an alien." Pendergrass insisted the program did not violate Orange County's 2007 resolution opposing participation in the federal 287(g) program, which marshals local law enforcement agencies to arrest and detain undocumented immigrants. "I never know if somebody is wanted by immigration, because they don't tell me, and we have no way of knowing," he said. "We're not like Alamance County, and other counties, where they enter into an agreement—and they hold in the jail illegal aliens." Instead, Pendergrass said, "If they call us and tell us, 'You have Joe Blow, and he's an alien,' that's their business, and we don't get involved. If he's there on charges, he has to have all his charges resolved in Orange before immigration can touch him. It's just a simple thing people have misunderstood." Orange County Attorney Geoff Gledhill said at the meeting that he did not think Pendergrass' participation in the program violates the county resolution, but noted that Secure Communities relates to "certain provisions of section 287(g)." However, the difference between the two programs is slim, said Marty Rosenbluth, staff attorney at the Southern Coalition for Justice. He told the Commissioners that Secure Communities "doesn't just violate the spirit and intent of this resolution, but it also violates the color of the law." "The effect of joining Secure Communities is to give ICE unfettered access to immigration information about members of the Orange County community," he wrote in a letter to the board. "Once ICE has matched the fingerprints of a detainee in Orange County jail, it is up to ICE, not the sheriff, to decide whether or not ICE will take action against the person," the letter went on. According to ICE, once a person is identified through the Secure Communities program, "[r]esponses may include such actions as: placing the alien immediately in ICE custody to avoid release; conducting personal interviews to gather additional information from the alien; placing detainers; and issuing charging documents." Immigration and Customs Enforcement is a division of the Department of Homeland Security. While Pendergrass distinguished Orange County's immigration program from 287(g) participating counties such as Alamance, Wake and Mecklenburg, he said that soon, all of North Carolina would be reporting fingerprinting data to federal immigration authorities. "By the end of the year, and maybe the first few months of 2010, the whole system in the state of North Carolina will be just like ours," he said. Matt Saldaña, msaldana (at) indyweek (dot) com

Felon Disenfranchisement

The widespread practice of denying voting rights to people with felony convictions in the United States disenfranchises 5.3 million citizens. Eleven states restrict voting by people even after they have completed their sentence, including prison, probation and parole, and many are barred for life. Approximately 1.5 million people are disenfranchised post-sentence. No other democratic nation disenfranchises people for life even after completion of sentence, and many impose no restrictions at all on people with felony convictions. On March 7, 2008, The United Nations' Committee on the Elimination of Racial Discrimination called on the U.S. to automatically restore voting rights to people with felony convictions upon completion of their criminal sentence, and raised concern that such policies have a disparate racial and ethnic impact and may be in violation of international law. "The Committee remains concerned about the disparate impact that existing felon disenfranchisement laws have on a large number of persons belonging to racial, ethnic and national minorities, in particular African-American persons, who are disproportionately represented at every stage of the criminal justice system," concluded the Committee in their recommendations to the U.S. Government. These recommendations come on the heels of new research conducted by The Sentencing Project that finds 1 in 50 African-American women cannot vote, an increase of nearly 14% since 2000. This rate of disenfranchisement is nearly four times the rate for non-African-American women. Overall, an estimated 792,200 women are ineligible to vote as a result of U.S. felony disenfranchisement laws. Currently, an estimated 1.4 million African-American men, 13%, are locked out of the ballot box, a rate seven times the national average. Given current rates of incarceration, three in ten of the next generation of black men can expect to be disenfranchised at some point in their lifetime. To view a copy of the Committee's recommendations, please visit: http://www2.ohchr.org/english/bodies/cerd/docs/co/CERD-C-USA-CO-6.pdf. To learn more about U.S. felony disenfranchisement policy and its impact, see these reports by The Sentencing Project: Felony Disenfranchisement Rates for Women http://sentencingproject.org/Admin%5CDocuments%5Cpublications%5Cfd_bs_women.pdf Felony Disenfranchisement Laws in the United States http://sentencingproject.org/Admin%5CDocuments%5Cpublications%5Cfd_bs_fdlawsinus.pdf.