Covington v. North Carolina

Voting Rights
GERRYMANDERING  |  VICTORY

Case Summary

Filed 08/11/2016
Decided 02/06/2018
Updated 06/10/2024

Southern Coalition for Social Justice successfully challenged 28 of North Carolina's 2011 state house and senate districts as racial gerrymanders in violation of the Equal Protections Clause on behalf of 31 individual voters in the U.S. District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina, with co-counsel from Poyner Spruill, LLP.

After an expedited discovery period and a five-day bench trial, the trial court rendered judgemnt in favor of plaintiffs, finding race predominated in the drawing of 28 districts with the effect of creating districts with high Black Voting Age Populations (i.e., packing Black voters) without justification in violation of the Fourteenth Amendment. On Appeal, the Supreme Court summarily affirmed the trial court's judgment in a June 5, 2017 decision.

Why it's Important

This case addressed issues of racial gerrymandering and the constitutional rights of voters to fair representation. The decision highlighted the power dynamics in redistricting processes and the role of the courts in ensuring electoral fairness.

Other Related Cases

Alexander v. South Carolina State Conference of the NAACP

SCSJ and a coalition of civil rights groups called upon the U.S. Supreme Court as amici curiae to affirm that South Carolina’s congressional map is racially gerrymandered, in violation of the 14th Amendment.

Learn More

T.N. NAACP v. Lee

SCSJ filed this challenge to Tennessee’s congressional and state Senate districts on behalf of five organizations, challenging the new voting plans as unconstitutional racial gerrymanders.

Learn More