Voting Rights

|

City of Greensboro, et al., v. Guilford County Board of Elections

Closed (Judgement)

|

North Carolina

|

Updated 05/11/2026

This was a federal court challenge to the North Carolina legislature’s 2015 redistricting of the Greensboro City Council.

The city of Greensboro pinned on a state map

Subscribe for Updates

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

Case Documents

$

Related Media

$

Case Contact

$

Case Summary

This was a federal court challenge to the North Carolina legislature's 2015 redistricting of the Greensboro City Council. Southern Coalition for Social Justice, along with co-counsel from Brooks Pierce, challenged the 2015 redistricting on behalf of six voters (Lewis A. Brandon III, Joyce Johnson, Nelson Johnson, Richard Alan Koritz, Sandra Self Koritz, and Charli Mae Sykes) as violating the Equal Protections Clauses in the U.S. and North Carolina State Constitutions. Specifically, plaintiffs alleged that the prohibition against a local referendum to change the city's election system was unconstitutional; that the legislation violated the one-person, one-vote principle by under-populating white districts and over-populating minority districts; and that one district was an unconstitutional racial gerrymander.

After a two-day bench trial in February 2017, the trial court invalidated the prohibition against a local referendum, held that the redistricting violated the one-person, one-vote principle under the Equal Protection Clause, and enjoined the use of the 2015 redistricting plan. In light of its other rulings, the Court did not reach the racial gerrymandering claim. A permanent injunction was granted.

 

Why it's Important

Racial gerrymandering prevents voters of color from electing their preferred candidates through redistricting without a compelling reason. According to the Equal Protection Clause of the 14th Amendment, states are required to "govern impartially [and] not draw distinctions between individuals solely on differences that are irrelevant to a legitimate governmental objective."

Case Documents

Case Contact

Jeff Loperfido Headshot

Jeff Loperfido

Jeff Loperfido serves as Chief Counsel of Voting Rights at SCSJ. He previously served as Voting Rights Senior Counsel. His practice focuses on litigation and policy advocacy that ensures the fair and […]