Kivett v. North Carolina State Board of Elections 

Voting Rights
Military members filling out their mail-in ballots
ABSENTEE VOTING  |  PENDING

Case Summary

Filed 10/02/2024
Updated 11/19/2024

The Republican National Committee (RNC), North Carolina Republican Party (NCGOP) and two individual voters filed a lawsuit against the North Carolina State Board of Elections (NCSBE) challenging a decade-old state law, known as North Carolina’s Uniform Military and Overseas Voters Act (UMOVA), that protects the rights of certain children and dependents of military and overseas North Carolinians to register and vote in North Carolina, regardless of whether they have ever lived in the state. Plaintiffs sought an injunction from the Wake County Superior Court to prevent these eligible voters from casting a ballot, but it was rejected. The Plaintiffs appealed that decision first to the Court of Appeals and then to the North Carolina Supreme Court.  

In both appellate courts, Southern Coalition for Social Justice (SCSJ), along with co-counsel Campaign Legal Center and Selendy Gay PLLC, filed an amicus brief on behalf of clients Secure Families Initiative (SFI) and Count Every Hero, an unincorporated association of nine retired four-star admirals and generals, and former secretaries of the Army, Navy, and Air Force. 

The amicus brief submitted at the Court of Appeals and the Supreme Court represented the perspective of military families across the country, describing the voting process for military and overseas voters and highlighting how the relief sought by Plaintiffs would disenfranchise those voters. The Court of Appeals denied Plaintiffs’ motion for writ of supersedeas and dismissed their request for a preliminary injunction. The case is still pending before the North Carolina Supreme Court, where Plaintiffs have sought the same relief.  

Why it's Important

For more than a decade, UMOVA has  protected the rights of the children and dependents of military and overseas North Carolinians to register and vote in the state regardless of whether they have themselves lived there, as long as the last place their parents or legal guardians were eligible to vote was North Carolina and the voter has not previously registered to vote in any other state. The RNC’s request in this case would deliberately disenfranchise some otherwise eligible overseas and military voters, require additional verification and threaten to disenfranchise thousands of military voters, burdening the rights of all absentee military and overseas voters.  

North Carolina silhouette on purple circular background

Case Documents

Filed: 10/27/2024

Related Media

Other Related Cases

Republican National Committee v. North Carolina State Board of Elections, et. al.

The Republican National Committee (RNC) and the North Carolina Republican Party filed a complaint on Sept. 12 to stop University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill (UNC) students from using their digital Mobile One Cards as identification cards to vote in the 2024 election.

Learn More

Republican National Committee v. North Carolina State Board of Elections 

The NC State Conference of the NAACP and two impacted NC voters requested to intervene in a case to protect nearly a quarter of a million voters from the Republican National Committee’s and North Carolina Republican Party’s baseless attempt to force the State Board of Elections to remove them from the state’s voter rolls on the eve of the 2024 presidential election.

Learn More

Lackey v. Stinnie

SCSJ and others called on the United States Supreme Court as amici curiae to preserve everyday people’s ability to fight for their civil rights in court, no matter their income or resources.

Learn More