County of Los Angeles v. Mendez

Justice System Reform
Floral Motif with Blue Background
AMICUS  |  VICTORY

Case Summary

Filed 2/23/2017
Decided 05/30/2017
Updated 06/07/2024

In 2017, SCSJ represented the NAACP and Policy Council on Law Enforcement and the Mentally Ill as amici in County of Los Angeles v. Mendez. The "friend of the court" brief sought to defend a civil verdict against officers who shot a pregnant woman and her husband following a warrantless raid into the wrong house, violating their Fourth Amendment rights.

Why it's Important

This case addressed the legal principles surrounding police liability in use-of-force incidents. The U.S. Supreme Court's ultimate decision clarified the application of the "provocation rule," which held officers liable for use of deadly force if they intentionally or recklessly provoked a violent confrontation through a Fourth Amendment violation.

Other Related Cases

City & County of San Francisco v. Sheehan

SCSJ filed a “friend of the court” brief in the U.S. Supreme Court on behalf of the Policy Council on Law Enforcement and the Mentally Ill in a case where Teresa Sheehan was shot by police after brandishing a knife.

Learn More

Texas v. Charles Kleinert

SCSJ represented the NAACP of Austin and the Texas State Conference of NAACP Branches as amici curiae in a case involving an Austin, Texas, police officer who killed a Black man during a criminal investigation.

Learn More

Parker & Williams v. Coleman, et al.

SCSJ represented two residents of public housing in Washington, North Carolina, whose apartment was illegally raided by armed deputies who were at the wrong address.

Learn More