Uncategorized

Featured Entries

Census Outreach Project

QUICK LINKS
WHY DOES THE CENSUS MATTER?

Census counts are directly tied to the federal dollars communities receive for important services, such as education funding, affordable housing support, job training, social services, roads, bridges, and other community development opportunities.

Census counts also directly impact a community’s political voice because the numbers inform voting districts and determine how communities are represented. That’s why it is important to make sure that everyone is counted! History has taught us that many communities are undercounted, or are at higher risk of not being counted at all. These communities include:
  • People and families that live in rental property
  • Transient communities, such as the homeless and migrant workers
  • Native Americans and poor, rural communities
  • Immigrants (census counts are for everyone, regardless of citizenship status)
  • The elderly and people who live in group housing
We are contacting organizations in Virginia, North Carolina, Georgia, Florida, and Louisiana that are a trusted voice in their communities. In the 2000 census, these states had the highest rate of undercount in the South. We are hoping that you will work with us to help ensure that EVERYONE is counted in the 2010 census.

What you can do:
  1. Schedule 10 minutes to take an organizational phone survey with an SCSJ organizer.
  2. Sign up for our Census 2010 newsletter.
  3. Become an official Partner Organization with the US Census Bureau .
  4. Join or help form a local Complete Count Committee.
  5. This fall, attend one of our regional meetings for grassroots, policy, and service organizations to discuss strategies and tactics for reducing Census undercount in our communities (Advance RSVP page coming soon!).
  6. Apply for a Mini Grant from SCSJ to do community organizing and creative media outreach to ensure a full count in communities who are at risk of being undercounted (Application available soon!).
Join Us Today!

Environmental racism charged in New Hill sewage plant fight

New Hill, N.C. — Residents in the southwestern Wake County crossroads of New Hill have alleged environmental racism in their long-running fight to block a planned sewage plant. Western Wake Partners, which includes Cary, Apex, Morrisville, Holly Springs and part of Research Triangle Park, have proposed building a $327 million wastewater treatment plant on more than 230 acres in New Hill. The plant would sit between U.S. Highway 1, Old U.S. 1, Shearon Harris Road and New Hill-Holleman Road. State environmental regulators have set a January 2011 deadline for a new plant. The four towns pull water from Jordan Lake, and state officials said wastewater needs to be returned to the Cape Fear River basin and should no longer be discharged into the Neuse River basin. New Hill residents have fought the plan for several years through public hearings and in the courts. Their latest salvo in the battle is a claim of environmental racism. "First of all, it is right in the center of New Hill. It also borders a lot of (the) minority community and some low-income, elderly people," said Paul Barth, president of the New Hill Community Association. Poor, minority neighbors are less able to fight the plant, Barth said. "I think the towns felt that it was a spot that was convenient for them to save them some money, and there wouldn't be much resistance because (residents) didn't have the financial means to do anything," he said. Steve Brown, director of Cary's Department of Public Works and Utilities, denied the allegation. "That is not a factor in this decision," Brown said. Cary is leading the sewage plant venture and plans to assume 60 percent of the plant's costs. Brown said officials reviewed more than 30 possible sites for the plant, and the New Hill site was the best one they found. Three other sites in or near New Hill remain under consideration. A new plant also would benefit growth in southwestern Wake County, he said. Barth said he and other New Hill residents would prefer the plant be moved about a mile away from the proposed location. "There's a line in the movie 'Network' where the guy opens the window (and) says, 'We are mad as hell, and we are not going to take it anymore.' That's where we are," he said.

Preventing land loss among rural African-Americans

Preventing land loss among rural African-Americans Tuesday, April 14th, 2009 By Rob Schofield Why are vested interests blocking legal reforms that could help stop the bleeding? Quick take: Last week at the General Assembly, members of a House committee considered a bill advanced by advocates for rural African American landowners that would have improved the fairness of legal proceedings that often result in the taking of family farms. Unfortunately, as in the proceedings in question, the letter of the law and "efficiency" seem to be trumping actual justice and human decency. Here's an important issue that you probably haven't heard or thought much about lately: the loss of land by rural African Americans of modest income. For decades, the hemorrhaging of farmland has been a plague upon Black families. Here's how the folks at a North Carolina nonprofit known as the Land Loss Prevention Project describe one of the principal causes of this problem: "Like many poor people, rural African American farmers often failed to prepare wills before they died. In the absence of a proper will, state laws governed how the farmers' land was passed on to their heirs upon their death. What this usually meant was that interests in the land were passed on to a large number of people who were classified as "heirs" in the eyes of the courts, and when those heirs died themselves, their ownership interest in the land was passed on to their heirs. The result of this process is that in a relatively short period of time, ownership of small pieces of property have been split amongst hundreds (and sometimes even thousands) of people. As it stands now, any co-owner can seek the division or sale of a piece of property without regard to how much on an interest they own. What this means is that an individual who has a marginal ownership interest in a small portion of a piece of land, and who does not pay any taxes or contribute to maintaining the land in any way, can force the co-owners who are actually using the land to sell their portion as well." "Partition sales" The legal process by which some heirs can force the sale of the property in such a situation is referred to as a "partition" and the resulting sale of the land is known as a "partition sale." Occasionally, partitions can provide a service in cleaning up title to a piece of property. As the description above makes clear, however, there have been hundreds of situations in which the real world impact of the partition and subsequent sale is to end a family's historic ownership and occupation of land on which they had enjoyed a claim for a century or more. Such situations can be particularly pernicious when the real driving force behind the partition sale is developer or a lawyer (or a combination thereof) who is the main beneficiary of the whole process. In the most egregious situations, the land is actually scooped up at sale by the very same lawyer who brokered the whole transaction to begin with. In smaller rural counties in which African-Americans have always been relegated to the margins of society, one can only imagine the emotions of alienation for the family displaced from their birthright as it's snapped up by a local bigwig. Such situations conjure up disturbing images from reconstruction and the Jim Crow era. Finding solutions As a small, partial solution to the problem, advocates have proposed a package of bills this year at the General Assembly that would address some of the worst conflicts of interest and other major problems in the way partition sales are handled. One of these bills was heard for a few minutes in a House Committee last week. It deals with the situation in which the same attorney who represents one or more of the parties in the original partition action is subsequently appointed by the local clerk of court as the "commissioner" in the proceeding. The commissioner is supposed to be an unbiased, impartial person who oversees the actual land sale. As proponents of the legislation explained in the committee hearing last week, however, it's pretty darned difficult to explain to someone that's being displaced from their family plot how the same person who brought the action against them to begin with can act in their best interests when it's time to sell the land. At best, such a situation presents the appearance of an enormous conflict of interest. At worst, it reeks of the worst kind of an "inside job" - an old-fashioned fix in which simple people of modest means are run over by the local "powers-that-be" in their community. Conflicts of interest The proposed legislation make it explicitly clear that attorneys who represent any party in the partition would not be allowed to serve as a commissioner except when all parties (including the landholder) affirmatively agree to allow it. Unfortunately, although such a solution seems simple and straightforward enough, it has raised the ire of some real estate lawyers who practice in this area. Last week in committee, these attorneys argued that such a change would be "impractical." They contended that there are so few lawyers in rural counties that it would be hard to scare up a completely untainted commissioner. What they failed to acknowledge, is that there is no requirement in the law that the commissioner be an attorney. One of the most surprising moments in the meeting occurred when the House Minority Leader, Rep. Paul Stam, showed up at the meeting to address the matter (Stam is not a member of the committee and it is extremely unusual for a non-member to attend and ask to speak on their own at such a meeting.) Acting as a kind of self-appointed lobbyist and expert, Stam forcefully denounced the bill, echoing the positions of the other real estate lawyers and arguing that such a requirement would make it extremely difficult to effect such partitions. He then went on to explain that in his law practice, he had "handled 50 partitions." That this fact, in combination with his own active and vociferous participation in the debate over the bill, might itself have raised a few eyebrows did not seem to occur to the representative. At the end of the meeting, the bill was not even voted on and was instead sent to an ad hoc subcommittee, where it faces, at best, an extremely uncertain future. Going forward In the end, it seems, the rough treatment meted out to this one, modest little bill is emblematic of the whole subject of land loss by rural African-Americans. Not only are the powers-that-be indifferent to the reality facing these families, they're remarkably tin-eared when it comes to the perception of how the process (in the courts and the legislature) works. Let's hope that at some point, lawmakers come to the realization that, sometimes, there's more to justice than mere "efficiency" in the application of an old law and whether their individual consciences are clear.

North Carolina Wildlife Federation Opposes the OLF

NCWF RESOLUTION 2009 OPPOSITION TO OLF AT SANDBANKS AND HALE’S LAKE WHEREAS, The United States Navy (Navy) on January 22, 2008 released a new list of proposed sites for a possible Outlying Landing Field (OLF) to accommodate training for F18 Super Hornet Jets; and that this new list follows a retraction by the Navy of its previous preferred sites; and, WHEREAS, this new list of five potential sites includes two in northeastern North Carolina, one being in Gates and Hertford counties referred to as the Sandbanks site and another in Camden and Currituck counties referred to as the Hale’s Lake site; and, WHEREAS, the latter site would impact wildlife populations and associated eco-tourism and resource-based recreation at the federally protected and managed Great Dismal Swamp National Wildlife Refuge and the state protected and managed Merchants Millpond State Park and Dismal Swamp State Park where species include federally protected migratory birds such as snow geese and tundra swan, as well as, bald eagle, black bear, white-tailed deer and cottontail; and, WHEREAS, this site is a highly flammable peat bog, whereby any crashes and or fuel dumpage could potentially ignite and cause devastating, long-lasting wildfires; and, WHEREAS, the former site would also impact Merchants Millpond State Park and Great Dismal Swamp National Wildlife Refuge as well as the Chowan River bottomlands and the Chowan Swamp Gamelands; and, WHEREAS, the Chowan River bottomlands is distinguishably listed as an Important Bird Area vital for breeding and migrating neotropical birds including prothonotary and Swainson’s warblers; the Chowan Swamp Gamelands, one of the most extensive swamp forest ecosystems in North Carolina comprising 10,996 tax-payer purchased acres, managed by the North Carolina Wildlife Resources Commission, that teem with black bear, bobcat, river otter, bald eagle and include federally endangered/threatened flora and fauna such as red-cockaded Woodpecker, Henslow's sparrow, Rafinesque's big-eared bat, American alligator, and southeastern myotis, grassleaf arrowhead, pondspice, raven's boxseed, and Virginia least trillium; and, WHEREAS, the Chowan River, the cornerstone for the Chowan Gamelands and bottomlands, supplies most of the fresh water to the Albemarle Sound, which is part of the second largest estuary system in the U.S. (the Albemarle-Pamlico Estuary.) In 1979, the Chowan became the first river basin in NC to receive the “nutrient sensitive waters” classification. For the past two decades, concerned citizens and scientists have worked to restore water quality. The State’s Natural Heritage Program considers 100 miles of the Chowan and its tributaries significant aquatic habitat because of diverse, rare and vulnerable populations of freshwater mussels. The Chowan is also a critical and vast commercial and recreational fishery; and, WHEREAS, the proposed Sandhills site would include 435 acres of the Chowan and 1,629 acres of its watershed wetlands thus the North Carolina Division of Water Quality has recommended it should not be pursued and, in fact, this site was de-listed from considerations previously in 2003 due to federally protected species and potential bird “flight safety” concerns; and, WHEREAS, construction of an OLF at any site, including the Sandbanks and Hale’s Lake sites, will have immediate impacts on 30,000 acres yet additional impacts to wildlife and habitats extending much further due to contributing noise and air pollution factors; and, WHEREAS, a constant naval operations of 32,000 cycles per year – day and night – will disrupt wildlife populations within the site contour and entire flight range; and, WHEREAS, it is documented that F-18s use military fuel designated JP-8 that includes the flame retardant ethylene dipromide, an additive banned by the Environmental Protection Agency in 1993, and that in cases whereby Navy pilots dump fuel to reduce landing heights and speeds would, at these two North Carolina sites, degrade terrestrial and aquatic wildlife and habitat ; and, WHEREAS, previous Navy proposed sites have cost taxpayers at least $25 million dollars in the vetting process already and it is not clearly documented in full that the Navy even requires an OLF. THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, the North Carolina Wildlife Federation opposes the proposed OLF sites at Sandbanks and Hale’s Lake due to the negative and potentially irreversible wildlife and environmental damages they would cause; and that these two sites should be immediately removed from any further consideration now or at any time in the future. Date: ____February 28, 2009___________________

Apex Community Fights Wastewater Facility

By Jaclyn Asztalos, NBC17, 2 weeks, 5 days ago Updated: Mar. 25 2:47 pm APEX, N.C. - The New Hill community continues to fight against the construction of the Western Wake Regional Wastewater Management Facility in the historic neighborhood. Residents gathered at the New Hill Baptist Church Tuesday to prepare statements for the upcoming public hearing. Their statements will focus on the recently released Environmental Impact Statement. The statement discusses the environmental impact on the site along with three alternative sites. The facility will serve Apex, Cary, Holly Springs and Morrisville. President Paul Barth of the New Hill Community Association said the group must make a clear and strong argument. Barth said the facility will impact on low-income and elderly residents who live nearby with traffic, odor and the lights from the facility. In addition, the site is in the middle of the community's historic district. "We are gathering for a workshop to go through different points we want to go through at the public hearing. We don't want to be redundant every time someone goes up to speak so we're going through a lot of different point so we can hit on those," Barth said. Chris Brook is with the Southern Coalition for Social Justice, a group supporting the New Hill community. "There are a lot of human impacts from this site and there are not as many human impacts with the alternatives," Brook said. The public hearing will take place on April 14 at the Apex Town Hall.

New Hill residents protest sewage plant plans

The battle over where to build a wastewater treatment plant is heating up in western Wake County. Cary, Apex, Holly Springs, and Morrisville officials want to put the facilities in New Hill, but those living there said it's a rotten deal. A toilet in the front yard could be a sign of an incompetent plumber, but Wayne Womble, a New Hill resident, has it there as a show of protest. "We don't consider this within reason," Womble said. “I don't want yours if you don't want mine." He and many others living in New Hill are protesting a plan to build a wastewater treatment plant less than a mile down from downtown New Hill. Womble stated, "This is really the only populated spot here and they want to put in right here in the middle of town." The plant would be built on a 200 acre site. And the $190 million dollar facility would process waste from Cary, Apex, Morrisville, and Holly Springs. People in New Hill worry about the smell. "I’m told by people who live near similar plants that it can be considerable," Guy Meilleur, a New Hill resident stated. There's still another very big reason why they don't want it. And that's because most of the people out would have access to the plant because they use septic tanks. Womble said, "It's kind of like us going to your place and putting our outhouse in your backyard and taking the key home." Town of Cary officials said they've studied this issue for years and New Hill is the best fit for a number of reasons. "A very important criteria to us was to not have to relocate anymore families than we had to," Kim Fisher, a Cary representative, said. It's also one of the few single tracks of land large enough and economically viable. And officials said the way western Wake is growing, the plant will be desperately need in the near future. Fisher added, "We're just trying to be good stewards to our customers." Womble isn't arguing about the need, he said either hook the town up to the plant or put it somewhere else. Cary officials said they plan to have the wastewater treatment plant up and running in late 2010.

New Hill Community Map

From This map shows the proposed sites for the Western Wake Partners sewage treatment plant. It is clear on the map that site 14, New…

SaveFreemanBeach.Com

SaveFreemanBeach.com is a new website about the history of Freeman Beach in an effort to save this beachfront property from development. Visit http://www.savefreemanbeach.com

Recession Adds To Hurdles Facing U.S. Census

A year from now, the U.S. will conduct its decennial population count. The findings are used to re-apportion congressional districts, disburse federal funding — even decide where new traffic lights go. But the economic crisis threatens to make this daunting task even harder. There is special concern about minority groups, which are traditionally hard to count. Listen to story by clicking link above.

New Hill Sewage Treatment Plant

** UPDATE 2/12/10: SCSJ releases its response to the Army Corps of Engineers Final Environmental Impact Study **

New Hill is a small unincorporated community in Wake County, NC. In October 2004, New Hill was selected by Western Wake Partners, a partnership between the governments of Cary, Apex, Holly Springs, and Morrisville, as the site where a new sewage treatment plant would be located. There are clear environmental injustices in this case. The population surrounding the site is upwards of 75% ethnic/racial minorities. Ironically, the community does not currently have access to sewer services, and only the property that is directly adjacent to the plant would be connected to it. The community has also been targeted for negative environmental impacts before - the Shearon Harris nuclear power plant, one of only three in the state, is also located there. The towns represented in Western Wake Partners are all far from the borders of New Hill and their populations include a much lower percentage of ethnic/racial minorities of about 19% on average. The New Hill Community Association has been fighting this plan for several years and is now represented by SCSJ. We will be holding community meetings and pursuing legal strategies as the case goes forward. SIGN THE ONLINE PETITION TO SUPPORT THE NEW HILL COMMUNITY AND END THIS CASE OF ENVIRONMENTAL RACISM
Updates: [view:updates=Node=40]
Resources: [view:resources=Node=40]
Press Coverage Archive: [view:press_coverage=Node=40]
Media: [view:media=Node=40]