Case Summary
At the same time that its legislative and Congressional plans were being challenged under Section 2 of the Voting Rights Act, the State of Texas sought preclearance under Section 5 of the VRA in the District Court for the District of Columbia. Southern Coalition for Social Justice, along with co-counsel Gary Bledsoe, Robert Notzon, and the NAACP, represented the Texas NAACP and individual citizens opposing preclearance of the plans because certain districts harmed the rights of minority voters. At trial in 2012, the U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia denied preclearance for each of the plans. The evidence SCSJ presented was critical to a finding of intentional discrimination by the trial court.
The U.S. Supreme Court deemed the case moot in light of the decision in Shelby v. Holder, which struck down the preclearance requirement in the Voting Rights Act.
Why it's Important
This case was important to protect minority voters who would have been harmed by Texas' redistricting plans at the time. The U.S. Supreme Court decision removing the preclearance required by Section 5 of the VRA marked a turning point for the worse in voting rights, particularly across the South.
Case Documents
Related Media
SCSJ Files Groundbreaking Motion asking to have Texas put back under Section 5 Review
DC Federal Court rules that Texas’ statewide redistricting maps violate the Voting Rights Act
SCSJ in 2-Week Trial Urging the D.C. District Court to Find Texas’ Redistricting Plans Racially Discriminatory
Victory for the NAACP in Texas Redistricting Case
Other Related Cases
State of Louisiana v. Phillip Callais, et al.
The Louisiana State Legislature created a new congressional map in 2024 with two majority-Black districts after a prior map was struck down.
Learn MoreMoore v. Harper
SCSJ filed this challenge to North Carolina’s state legislative and congressional maps, alleging all three maps constituted intentional partisan gerrymanders that deprived North Carolina voters of their right to Free Elections under the North Carolina state constitution.
Learn MoreNorth Carolina NAACP v. Berger (consolidated with Williams v. Hall)
SCSJ is challenging North Carolina’s 2023 congressional and state legislative voting maps, alleging that all three maps diminish the power of Black voters all across the state.
Learn More