Case Summary
At the same time that its legislative and Congressional plans were being challenged under Section 2 of the Voting Rights Act, the State of Texas sought preclearance under Section 5 of the VRA in the District Court for the District of Columbia. Southern Coalition for Social Justice, along with co-counsel Gary Bledsoe, Robert Notzon, and the NAACP, represented the Texas NAACP and individual citizens opposing preclearance of the plans because certain districts harmed the rights of minority voters. At trial in 2012, the U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia denied preclearance for each of the plans. The evidence SCSJ presented was critical to a finding of intentional discrimination by the trial court.
The U.S. Supreme Court deemed the case moot in light of the decision in Shelby v. Holder, which struck down the preclearance requirement in the Voting Rights Act.
Why it's Important
This case was important to protect minority voters who would have been harmed by Texas' redistricting plans at the time. The U.S. Supreme Court decision removing the preclearance required by Section 5 of the VRA marked a turning point for the worse in voting rights, particularly across the South.
Case Documents
Related Media
SCSJ Files Groundbreaking Motion asking to have Texas put back under Section 5 Review
DC Federal Court rules that Texas’ statewide redistricting maps violate the Voting Rights Act
SCSJ in 2-Week Trial Urging the D.C. District Court to Find Texas’ Redistricting Plans Racially Discriminatory
Victory for the NAACP in Texas Redistricting Case
Other Related Cases
NC NAACP v. Lewis
This case challenged four Wake County House districts in N.C.’s 2017 plan on the ground that they violate the state constitution’s prohibition against mid-decade redistricting.
Read More NC NAACP v. Lewis
Finn v. Cobb County
Southern Coalition for Social Justice has challenged the new 2022 districts for Cobb County School Board as racially gerrymandered.
Read More Finn v. Cobb County
Abbott v. Perez
Southern Coalition for Social Justice challenged Texas’s congressional and state house redistricting after the 2010 census on behalf of the Texas State Conference of the NAACP and five individuals. In their complaint, plaintiffs alleged Texas's 2011 and 2013 maps were intentionally racially discriminatory in violation of the Fourteenth Amendment and the Voting Rights Act.
Read More Abbott v. Perez