Case Summary
This was a federal court challenge to the North Carolina legislature’s 2015 redistricting of the Greensboro City Council. Southern Coalition for Social Justice, along with co-counsel from Brooks Pierce, challenged the 2015 redistricting on behalf of six voters (Lewis A. Brandon III, Joyce Johnson, Nelson Johnson, Richard Alan Koritz, Sandra Self Koritz, and Charli Mae Sykes) as violating the Equal Protections Clauses in the U.S. and North Carolina State Constitutions. Specifically, plaintiffs alleged that the prohibition against a local referendum to change the city’s election system was unconstitutional; that the legislation violated the one-person, one-vote principle by under-populating white districts and over-populating minority districts; and that one district was an unconstitutional racial gerrymander.
After a two-day bench trial in February 2017, the trial court invalidated the prohibition against a local referendum, held that the redistricting violated the one-person, one-vote principle under the Equal Protection Clause, and enjoined the use of the 2015 redistricting plan. In light of its other rulings, the Court did not reach the racial gerrymandering claim. A permanent injunction was granted.
Why it's Important
Racial gerrymandering prevents voters of color from electing their preferred candidates through redistricting without a compelling reason. According to the Equal Protection Clause of the 14th Amendment, states are required to "govern impartially [and] not draw distinctions between individuals solely on differences that are irrelevant to a legitimate governmental objective."
Case Documents
Related Media
Federal Judge Overturns Legislature's Greensboro Redistricting Scheme
Other Related Cases
Common Cause v. Byrd
SCSJ and co-counsel filed a federal challenge to the 2022 Florida congressional map that discriminatorily diminishes the ability of Black voters to elect candidates of their choice.
Read More Common Cause v. Byrd
Texas v. United States
SCSJ represented the Texas NAACP against the state of Texas, in which Texas is seeking federal preclearance for its Congressional, State House and State Senate redistricting plans.
Read More Texas v. United States
Alexander v. South Carolina State Conference of the NAACP
SCSJ and a coalition of civil rights groups called upon the U.S. Supreme Court as amici curiae to affirm that South Carolina’s congressional map is racially gerrymandered, in violation of the 14th Amendment.
Read More Alexander v. South Carolina State Conference of the NAACP
